Total length of flow path
Long-length flow path
A longer flow path means smaller flow variations under pressure changes — and a more consistent emitter output across the lateral.
Linear inches
Presentation Animations
Dina's legacy sales presentation animations are now converted for the web and paired with native comparison data so buyers can see why the Max-Emitter resists plugging.
Keep pore space open for oxygen
Controlled wetting coats the ore while leaving connected air voids available for the leach reaction.
Presentation animation: leaching and capillary action
Comparison Data
The Max-Emitter advantage is not one dimension. It combines inlet screening, path length, and flow volume so particles have fewer opportunities to stop the emitter.
Total length of flow path
A longer flow path means smaller flow variations under pressure changes — and a more consistent emitter output across the lateral.
Linear inches
Total screen area
At a full 330°, the Max-Emitter offers the largest inlet screen area available. More screen area = less plugging and higher production.
Square inches
Total volume of flow path
A large flow-path volume prevents plugging by letting particulates pass through the emitter rather than catching at constrictions.
Cubic inches
Comparison table
The advantage shows up when all three measures are read together: path length, inlet screen area, and available flow volume.
| Emitter | Flow path | Screen area | Flow volume | Max-Emitter advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max-Emitter | 12.50 linear in | 0.406 in² | 0.069 in³ | Benchmark |
| NetaFim TurboNet | 2.54 linear in | 0.053 in² | 0.010 in³ | 4.9× path, 7.7× screen, 6.9× volume |
| Toro | 8.95 linear in | 0.008 in² | 0.028 in³ | 1.4× path, 50.8× screen, 2.5× volume |
| Plastro | 6.45 linear in | 0.045 in² | 0.025 in³ | 1.9× path, 9.0× screen, 2.8× volume |
Published specifications from each manufacturer, as reported on Ore-Max.com emitter comparison.